From Demand to Production: MRP and MRP II
Material Requirements Planning (MRP) is the backbone of manufacturing planning. It answers three questions: What to produce/buy, How much, and When.
MRP inputs:
- Master Production Schedule (MPS) — the authorised production plan for finished goods, derived from demand forecasts and actual orders
- Bill of Materials (BOM) — the recipe: every parent–child relationship, quantity-per, and scrap allowance
- Inventory records — on-hand quantity, open POs, and work-in-process at every level of the BOM
MRP output: time-phased planned orders (purchase or production) for every component, offset by lead time. The logic is:
Net Requirement = Gross Requirement − On-Hand − Scheduled Receipts
Planned Order Release = Planned Receipt − Lead Time
MRP II extended MRP to include capacity requirements planning (CRP), financial simulation, and rough-cut capacity checks, integrating the shop floor with the business plan.
ERP systems (SAP S/4HANA, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics) embed MRP II logic as a core module, connecting demand management, procurement, manufacturing, and financials in a single system of record.
Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES)
An MES bridges the planning layer (ERP) and the physical shop floor (machines, operators, PLCs). While ERP says what to make and when, MES manages the how — in real time.
Core MES functions (ISA-95 / ISA-88 standard):
- Work order management — release, sequence, and dispatch production orders to work centres
- Labour and machine tracking — capture actual time against each operation, compare to standard
- Material traceability — scan barcodes or RFID to record exact materials consumed in each unit/batch (critical for recall management in pharma, food, aerospace)
- Quality management — in-process inspections, Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts, non-conformance capture, and CAPA integration
- OEE monitoring — real-time Availability, Performance, and Quality KPIs per machine/line, with downtime reason coding
- Electronic device history record (eDHR) — regulated industries (FDA 21 CFR Part 11, EU GMP Annex 11) require complete electronic batch records
Leading MES platforms:
| Platform | Vendor | Specialty |
|---|---|---|
| SIMATIC IT | Siemens | Discrete & process, tightly integrated with Siemens automation |
| Opcenter | Siemens | Pharma, medical device, electronics |
| FactoryTalk | Rockwell Automation | Discrete manufacturing, Allen-Bradley PLCs |
| SAP ME / MII | SAP | SAP ERP integration, automotive |
| Plex | Rockwell Automation | Cloud-native MES, automotive & food |
| AVEVA MES | AVEVA | Process industries, oil & gas, batch |
| Tulip | Tulip Interfaces | No-code, operator-centric, SMB-friendly |
Push vs. Pull Production Systems
Push (MRP-Driven)
- Production triggered by forecast / planned demand
- Work orders released in advance of actual need
- Builds inventory buffers to absorb forecast error
- Good for long lead-time, stable-demand products
- Risk: over-production, high WIP, slow response to change
- ERP / MRP is the control mechanism
- Examples: seasonal product pre-build, constrained supplier lead items
Pull (Kanban / Lean)
- Production triggered only by actual consumption downstream
- Kanban cards/bins signal replenishment need
- Minimises WIP and finished-goods inventory
- Good for high-mix, variable-demand environments
- Risk: stockout if demand spikes exceed kanban capacity
- Supermarket / heijunka box is the control mechanism
- Examples: Toyota Production System, assembly lines, spare parts
Lean Manufacturing Principles
Lean originated with the Toyota Production System (TPS) and was codified by Womack & Jones (1996) as five principles:
- Specify Value — define value from the customer's perspective (price willing to pay)
- Map the Value Stream — identify all steps; categorise as value-add, necessary non-value-add, or pure waste
- Create Flow — eliminate interruptions so value flows continuously (one-piece flow, U-cells)
- Establish Pull — let customer demand pull production; avoid over-production
- Pursue Perfection — continuous improvement (kaizen) toward zero waste
The 8 wastes (TIM WOODS):
- Transportation — unnecessary movement of materials
- Inventory — excess raw material, WIP, or finished goods
- Motion — unnecessary operator movement
- Waiting — idle time for machine, operator, or material
- Overproduction — making more than needed, earlier than needed
- Over-processing — more steps or precision than the customer values
- Defects — rework, scrap, warranty
- Skills — unused human potential and creativity
Key lean tools: Value Stream Mapping (VSM), 5S, SMED, Poka-Yoke (error-proofing), Andon (problem-escalation signal), OEE dashboards, A3 problem-solving.
Industry 4.0 Technologies on the Shop Floor
| Technology | Application | Benefit | Example Platform/Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Twin | Real-time virtual replica of machines/lines for simulation & predictive maintenance | Reduce unplanned downtime 30–50% | Siemens Tecnomatix, ANSYS Twin Builder, PTC ThingWorx |
| IIoT Sensors | Vibration, temperature, current monitoring on motors/spindles | Early fault detection, OEE improvement | Bosch Rexroth, National Instruments, Siemens MindSphere |
| AI Visual Inspection | Camera + deep learning for 100% defect detection on production line | Replace manual sampling; detect sub-mm defects | Cognex ViDi, Landing AI, Neurala |
| Collaborative Robots (Cobots) | Flexible automation of pick-and-place, assembly, testing beside humans | Reduce cycle time, ergonomic injury | Universal Robots UR series, FANUC CRX, ABB GoFa |
| Augmented Reality | Guided assembly instructions projected on workpiece | Reduce error rate, training time 40% | PTC Vuforia, Scope AR, Google Glass Enterprise |
| Additive Manufacturing | On-demand spare part printing, tooling fixtures, low-volume custom parts | Eliminate spare-part inventory, faster NPI | Stratasys, EOS, Markforged |
| RTLS (Real-Time Location) | Track WIP, tools, AGVs on shop floor with UWB or RFID | Eliminate search time, ensure FIFO compliance | Zebra Technologies, Ubisense, Quuppa |